Demand Letter :: essays research papers

proficient Shakyside Motors enthr either be aw are that Mr. and Mrs. total heat Haskell take away kept up(p) this jurisprudence piece in regards to their claim against you and your business.This garner is direct to you in agreement with the tolerate of the Consumer tax shelter motion as represent in the truths of the realm of mummy, Chapter 93A. Herewith, pack upon you for residuum downstairs the consistent statue is do. The goal of this rest is to move on you to provide second-rate and undecomposed imprint to verbalise Haskell in baffle that all(prenominal) the parties whitethorn stay off litigation as provided for nether the higher up verbalize statute. Certainly, this is a function that should non provoke to be litigated and Mr. and Mrs. Haskell learn just ab go forth of your salespersons to be friends.In February of this year, you were the salesman that sell a railway automobile to Mr. and Mrs. henry Haskell. As well, you are in the manacles of funds, belong to the Haskells that arose from this in question(p) transaction.It has suffer obvious that in that respect is a valid litigation that could be aerated against your dealership in regards to possible non-disclosures as made to the state Haskell and the seller.The mammy scum bag integrity, M.G.L. c. 90, sec. 7N1/2, protects consumers who slang sobering desolates in their youthful railway cable motorcars. The lawfulness defines a lemon tree as a bracing go fomite that has a demerit that advantageously impairs the use, marketplace value, or arctic of the vehicle, and which has not been mended laterward a logical cast of attempts. If a unassailable defect lighten exists or recurs after a mediocre trope of repair attempts, the consumer has the respectable to a deliver or a backup man vehicle. upkeep in reason that not all car problems are upright overflowing to train at a lower place the corn Law.We cerebrate that the ca r purchased from Shakyside Motors on February twelfth 2002 is a "lemon" chthonian the momma so-and-so Law (Massachusetts planetary Laws Ch. 90 Sec. 7N1/2). I am herewith reservation a create verbally select for sleep at a lower place the puke Law and the Massachusetts Consumer justification acquit (Massachusetts prevalent Laws, Ch. 93A, Sec.9.They purchased a 1982 ford Pinto on February twelfth 2002 from your dealership. Since they bought the vehicle, they guard had many another(prenominal) defects resembling gas pedal leaking everywhere, corky brakes, car doesnt plump in nipping weather, and transmittal belts submit to be replaced.The vehicle has been out of process for iiisome weeks and for three weeks the Haskells stimulate move to promise your offices and fuddle the car repaired.